upper extremity cat score Search Results


90
ProMIS Neurosciences upper extremity cat (ue)
Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures
Upper Extremity Cat (Ue), supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/upper extremity cat (ue)/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
upper extremity cat (ue) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProMIS Neurosciences upper extremity physical function cat v 2.0
Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures
Upper Extremity Physical Function Cat V 2.0, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/upper extremity physical function cat v 2.0/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
upper extremity physical function cat v 2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProMIS Neurosciences upper extremity (p-ue) surveys
Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures
Upper Extremity (P Ue) Surveys, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/upper extremity (p-ue) surveys/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
upper extremity (p-ue) surveys - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProMIS Neurosciences pf upper extremity cat
<t> PROMIS </t> scores across subspecialties.
Pf Upper Extremity Cat, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pf upper extremity cat/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pf upper extremity cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProMIS Neurosciences cat upper extremity scale
<t> PROMIS </t> scores across subspecialties.
Cat Upper Extremity Scale, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cat upper extremity scale/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cat upper extremity scale - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProMIS Neurosciences cat forms for upper extremity physical function
<t> PROMIS </t> scores across subspecialties.
Cat Forms For Upper Extremity Physical Function, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cat forms for upper extremity physical function/product/ProMIS Neurosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cat forms for upper extremity physical function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures

Journal: The Journal of hand surgery

Article Title: Association of physical function, anxiety, and pain interference in non-shoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform

doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.008

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures

Article Snippet: Median Range Functional Scores PROMIS PF CAT 1217 44.9 ± 10.2 46.0 15.3 – 73.3 PROMIS UE CAT 1197 35.6 ± 10.0 34.9 14.3 – 56.3 qDASH 1023 42.7 ± 24.1 43.2 0.0 – 97.7 Non-Functional Scores PROMIS Anxiety CAT 1251 53.3 ± 9.9 53.6 34.1 – 84.9 PROMIS PI CAT 1235 59 ± 7.9 58.9 39.6 – 81.0 Open in a separate window Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 PF UE qDASH Anxiety PI PROMIS Physical Function CAT (PF) 1.00 - - - - PROMIS Upper Extremity CAT (UE) 0.71 (strong) 1.00 - - - p <0.05 Quick DASH (qDASH) −0.73 −0.85 (strong) (strong) 1.00 - - p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Anxiety CAT (Anxiety) −0.46 −0.48 0.53 (moderate) (moderate) (moderate) 1.00 - p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Pain Interference CAT (PI) −0.60 −0.65 0.76 0.55 (strong) (strong) (strong) (moderate) 1.00 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 Open in a separate window Pearson Correlation Coefficients Age, sex, employment status, and smoking status were observed to be potential confounders of the three functional outcome scores , and were controlled for in the multivariable linear regression model. PROMIS Anxiety and PI CAT scores both remained independently associated with all three functional outcomes (PROMIS PF and UE CATs, qDASH) in the multivariable regression model ( ).

Techniques: Functional Assay

Pearson Correlation Coefficients

Journal: The Journal of hand surgery

Article Title: Association of physical function, anxiety, and pain interference in non-shoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform

doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.008

Figure Lengend Snippet: Pearson Correlation Coefficients

Article Snippet: Median Range Functional Scores PROMIS PF CAT 1217 44.9 ± 10.2 46.0 15.3 – 73.3 PROMIS UE CAT 1197 35.6 ± 10.0 34.9 14.3 – 56.3 qDASH 1023 42.7 ± 24.1 43.2 0.0 – 97.7 Non-Functional Scores PROMIS Anxiety CAT 1251 53.3 ± 9.9 53.6 34.1 – 84.9 PROMIS PI CAT 1235 59 ± 7.9 58.9 39.6 – 81.0 Open in a separate window Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 PF UE qDASH Anxiety PI PROMIS Physical Function CAT (PF) 1.00 - - - - PROMIS Upper Extremity CAT (UE) 0.71 (strong) 1.00 - - - p <0.05 Quick DASH (qDASH) −0.73 −0.85 (strong) (strong) 1.00 - - p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Anxiety CAT (Anxiety) −0.46 −0.48 0.53 (moderate) (moderate) (moderate) 1.00 - p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Pain Interference CAT (PI) −0.60 −0.65 0.76 0.55 (strong) (strong) (strong) (moderate) 1.00 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 Open in a separate window Pearson Correlation Coefficients Age, sex, employment status, and smoking status were observed to be potential confounders of the three functional outcome scores , and were controlled for in the multivariable linear regression model. PROMIS Anxiety and PI CAT scores both remained independently associated with all three functional outcomes (PROMIS PF and UE CATs, qDASH) in the multivariable regression model ( ).

Techniques:

Identification of Potential Confounding Variables to be Included in the Multivariable Model

Journal: The Journal of hand surgery

Article Title: Association of physical function, anxiety, and pain interference in non-shoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform

doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.008

Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of Potential Confounding Variables to be Included in the Multivariable Model

Article Snippet: Median Range Functional Scores PROMIS PF CAT 1217 44.9 ± 10.2 46.0 15.3 – 73.3 PROMIS UE CAT 1197 35.6 ± 10.0 34.9 14.3 – 56.3 qDASH 1023 42.7 ± 24.1 43.2 0.0 – 97.7 Non-Functional Scores PROMIS Anxiety CAT 1251 53.3 ± 9.9 53.6 34.1 – 84.9 PROMIS PI CAT 1235 59 ± 7.9 58.9 39.6 – 81.0 Open in a separate window Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 PF UE qDASH Anxiety PI PROMIS Physical Function CAT (PF) 1.00 - - - - PROMIS Upper Extremity CAT (UE) 0.71 (strong) 1.00 - - - p <0.05 Quick DASH (qDASH) −0.73 −0.85 (strong) (strong) 1.00 - - p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Anxiety CAT (Anxiety) −0.46 −0.48 0.53 (moderate) (moderate) (moderate) 1.00 - p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Pain Interference CAT (PI) −0.60 −0.65 0.76 0.55 (strong) (strong) (strong) (moderate) 1.00 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 Open in a separate window Pearson Correlation Coefficients Age, sex, employment status, and smoking status were observed to be potential confounders of the three functional outcome scores , and were controlled for in the multivariable linear regression model. PROMIS Anxiety and PI CAT scores both remained independently associated with all three functional outcomes (PROMIS PF and UE CATs, qDASH) in the multivariable regression model ( ).

Techniques:

Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis

Journal: The Journal of hand surgery

Article Title: Association of physical function, anxiety, and pain interference in non-shoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform

doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.008

Figure Lengend Snippet: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis

Article Snippet: Median Range Functional Scores PROMIS PF CAT 1217 44.9 ± 10.2 46.0 15.3 – 73.3 PROMIS UE CAT 1197 35.6 ± 10.0 34.9 14.3 – 56.3 qDASH 1023 42.7 ± 24.1 43.2 0.0 – 97.7 Non-Functional Scores PROMIS Anxiety CAT 1251 53.3 ± 9.9 53.6 34.1 – 84.9 PROMIS PI CAT 1235 59 ± 7.9 58.9 39.6 – 81.0 Open in a separate window Summary of Functional and Non-Functional Outcome Measures table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 PF UE qDASH Anxiety PI PROMIS Physical Function CAT (PF) 1.00 - - - - PROMIS Upper Extremity CAT (UE) 0.71 (strong) 1.00 - - - p <0.05 Quick DASH (qDASH) −0.73 −0.85 (strong) (strong) 1.00 - - p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Anxiety CAT (Anxiety) −0.46 −0.48 0.53 (moderate) (moderate) (moderate) 1.00 - p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 PROMIS Pain Interference CAT (PI) −0.60 −0.65 0.76 0.55 (strong) (strong) (strong) (moderate) 1.00 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 p <0.05 Open in a separate window Pearson Correlation Coefficients Age, sex, employment status, and smoking status were observed to be potential confounders of the three functional outcome scores , and were controlled for in the multivariable linear regression model. PROMIS Anxiety and PI CAT scores both remained independently associated with all three functional outcomes (PROMIS PF and UE CATs, qDASH) in the multivariable regression model ( ).

Techniques:

 PROMIS  scores across subspecialties.

Journal: Journal of Orthopaedics

Article Title: A comparison of PROMIS Global Health-Mental and legacy orthopedic outcome measures for evaluating preoperative mental health status

doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: PROMIS scores across subspecialties.

Article Snippet: PROMIS PF Upper Extremity CAT , , , , .

Techniques:

Subspecialty-specific PROM scores.

Journal: Journal of Orthopaedics

Article Title: A comparison of PROMIS Global Health-Mental and legacy orthopedic outcome measures for evaluating preoperative mental health status

doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: Subspecialty-specific PROM scores.

Article Snippet: PROMIS PF Upper Extremity CAT , , , , .

Techniques:

Correlations between  PROMIS  and subspecialty-specific PROMs.

Journal: Journal of Orthopaedics

Article Title: A comparison of PROMIS Global Health-Mental and legacy orthopedic outcome measures for evaluating preoperative mental health status

doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlations between PROMIS and subspecialty-specific PROMs.

Article Snippet: PROMIS PF Upper Extremity CAT , , , , .

Techniques: